Nanohydroxyapatite vs. Fluoride

OJOOK

Fluoride vs. nano-hydroxyapatite toothpaste. Which is better?

Fluoride has been known to be effective at cavity prevention and remineralization when used with correct dosages. Too much fluoride can cause fluorosis (cosmetic damage to teeth commonly seen in children).

Hydroxyapatite is a material that naturally occurs in our bones, teeth, and saliva. And nano-hydroxyapatite has been shown to remineralize enamel by replacing minerals such as calcium and phosphate, that are lost from acid produced by bacteria.

Both fluoride and nano-hydroxyapatite remineralizes the teeth in different ways, and both are just as effective. Ultimately it boils down to your personal preference and which you feel is best suited for you.

Try this: OJOOK's Toothpaste with nHA + Bamboo Salt, S$28. Contains just 12 ingredients and water, including nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA) and Jukyeom, an ancient medicinal salt that is baked 9 times in bamboo. It helps to remineralize lost tooth enamel and restore the ideal balance of your mouth.

Also try this: OJOOK's Silk Floss with Bamboo Salt and Beeswax, S$18. An eco-friendly (plastic-free) treatment floss that 100% compostable Italian silk. It is loaded with healing ingredients — Korean medicinal bamboo salt (Jukyeom), ethically sourced beeswax, and hydroxyapatite. It is gentle, bouncy, and shred-resistant, lifting up debris between teeth with the utmost ease and comfort. 


Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published